Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined at
> > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> > 
> > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > 
> > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > option.
> 
> Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?

Did you verify it works? I only wrote it..



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux