Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:11:06 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Lynch <nathanl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200809185726.5d8e5f55@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20200717190931.701ddf08@canb.auug.org.au> <20200809185726.5d8e5f55@canb.auug.org.au>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Hi Stephen,

please drop my set_fs tree from linux-next.  It is not going to be
merged for 5.9 in this form.

Thanks!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: next/pending-fixes baseline: 224 runs, 13 regressions (v5.8-12062-g26dee840e516)
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux