Hi all,
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:04:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:00:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the security tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/anon_inodes.c: In function 'anon_inode_make_secure_inode':
> > fs/anon_inodes.c:70:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_inode_init_security_anon'; did you mean 'security_inode_init_security'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 70 | error = security_inode_init_security_anon(
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | security_inode_init_security
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 2749d3f84a70 ("Add a new LSM-supporting anonymous inode interface")
> >
> > # CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
> >
> > Also, the explicit include of linux/security.h is missing ...
> >
> > I have added the following patch for today.
> >
> > From b2bae25c9b715e06f7e802ec7b51cfbfec046e6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:43:01 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Add a new LSM-supporting anonymous inode interface"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/anon_inodes.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/security.h | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/anon_inodes.c b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > index f87f221167cf..25d92c64411e 100644
> > --- a/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > +++ b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/magic.h>
> > #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> > #include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/security.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > index 95c133a8f8bb..7c6b3dcf4721 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > @@ -735,6 +735,13 @@ static inline int security_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int security_inode_init_security_anon(struct inode *inode,
> > + const struct qstr *name,
> > + const struct inode *context_inode)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int security_old_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
> > struct inode *dir,
> > const struct qstr *qstr,
>
> I am still applying the above patch ...
The merge window is coming up fast ... is anything happening about this
failure?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpEkaVis8NhJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
