On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:46:50 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I can check further, but it can be it was not correctly reverted, > > > because everything should work just fine even with the revert, > > > though i i do not understand a reason of reverting. > > > > Vlad, how sure are you about this? We also start to trigger this now on > > linux-next, but the reverting patch surely looks like doggy without any useful > > information in the commit description. > > > Hello, Andrew, Qian. > > I am not aware of reason of the revert, though i tried to get through Ingo. > I can send out a patch that fixes the revert. Another option to drop the > revert, but it is up to Andrew and Ingo. > > Andrew, could you please comment on? All a bit mysterious. I think it's best that we revert this from linux-next until we hear from Ingo. I queued a patch - I expect Stephen will see and grab it, thanks.
