Hi all,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:52:02 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
>
> between commit:
>
> fc1e3aa0337c ("drm/i915/gvt: Fix incorrect check of enabled bits in mask registers")
>
> from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 5f4ae2704d59 ("drm/i915: Identify Cometlake platform")
>
> from the drm-intel tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
> index fadd2adb8030,26cae4846c82..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
> @@@ -1731,8 -1734,9 +1734,9 @@@ static int ring_mode_mmio_write(struct
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (IS_COFFEELAKE(vgpu->gvt->gt->i915) &&
> + if ((IS_COFFEELAKE(vgpu->gvt->gt->i915) ||
> + IS_COMETLAKE(vgpu->gvt->gt->i915)) &&
> - data & _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(2)) {
> + IS_MASKED_BITS_ENABLED(data, 2)) {
> enter_failsafe_mode(vgpu, GVT_FAILSAFE_UNSUPPORTED_GUEST);
> return 0;
> }
This is now a conflict between the drm tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpfFJG2Q5Lnv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
