Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 13:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251101030.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
References: <20200522001209.07c19400@canb.auug.org.au> <22332d9b-5e9f-5474-adac-9b3e39861aee@infradead.org> <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251101030.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)

> I'll try to find out which optimization does this, because it is a 
> slightly different scenario than hiding __noreturn from the callees. 
> Probably -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

And it is indeed -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

Miroslav

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  - From: Josh Poimboeuf

References:
- linux-next: Tree for May 21
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  - From: Miroslav Benes

Prev by Date: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
Next by Date: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux