Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Tue, 19 May 2020 17:23:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   116ac378bb3f ("powerpc/64s: machine check interrupt update NMI accounting")
> 
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
> 
>   187416eeb388 ("hardirq/nmi: Allow nested nmi_enter()")
> 
> from the rcu tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the powerpc tree version for now) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the powerpc commit and commit

  69ea03b56ed2 ("hardirq/nmi: Allow nested nmi_enter()")

from the tip tree.  I assume that the rcu and tip trees are sharing
some patches (but not commits) :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgp7jKec2gxK4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux