Hi Stephen,
On 4/30/20 22:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:06:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 3ba225b506a2 ("treewide: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member")
>>
>> from the kspp-gustavo tree and commit:
>>
>> d65dbedfd298 ("net/mlx5: Add support for COPY steering action")
>>
>> from the mlx5-next tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>> index 8d30f18dcdee,fb243848132d..000000000000
>> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>> @@@ -5743,7 -5771,7 +5771,7 @@@ struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_modify_header_con
>> u8 reserved_at_68[0x10];
>> u8 num_of_actions[0x8];
>>
>> - union mlx5_ifc_set_action_in_add_action_in_auto_bits actions[];
>> - union mlx5_ifc_set_add_copy_action_in_auto_bits actions[0];
>> ++ union mlx5_ifc_set_add_copy_action_in_auto_bits actions[];
>> };
>>
>> struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_modify_header_context_out_bits {
>> @@@ -9677,9 -9705,32 +9705,32 @@@ struct mlx5_ifc_mcda_reg_bits
>>
>> u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
>>
>> - u8 data[0][0x20];
>> + u8 data[][0x20];
>> };
>>
>> + enum {
>> + MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_TYPE_FULL_CHIP = BIT(0),
>> + MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_TYPE_NET_PORT_ALIVE = BIT(1),
>> + };
>> +
>> + enum {
>> + MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL0 = BIT(0),
>> + MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL3 = BIT(3),
>> + MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL6 = BIT(6),
>> + };
>> +
>> + struct mlx5_ifc_mfrl_reg_bits {
>> + u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
>> +
>> + u8 reserved_at_20[0x2];
>> + u8 pci_sync_for_fw_update_start[0x1];
>> + u8 pci_sync_for_fw_update_resp[0x2];
>> + u8 rst_type_sel[0x3];
>> + u8 reserved_at_28[0x8];
>> + u8 reset_type[0x8];
>> + u8 reset_level[0x8];
>> + };
>> +
>> struct mlx5_ifc_mirc_reg_bits {
>> u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
>> u8 status_code[0x8];
>
> This is now a conflict between the net-next and kspp-gustavo trees.
>
Thanks for reporting this. I think the best solution, for now, is to remove the
changes from my tree. I'll do it right away.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
