On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:57:37PM -0700, coverity-bot wrote: > Hello! > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by > Coverity from a scan of next-20200417 as part of the linux-next scan project: > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits: > > Wed Apr 1 13:23:27 2020 -0500 > e81e07244325 ("objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC generation") > > Coverity reported the following: > > *** CID 1492654: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK) > /tools/objtool/orc_gen.c: 123 in create_orc_entry() > 117 rela->sym = find_symbol_containing(insn_sec, > 118 insn_off - 1); > 119 } > 120 if (!rela->sym) { > 121 WARN("missing symbol for insn at offset 0x%lx\n", > 122 insn_off); > vvv CID 1492654: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK) > vvv Variable "rela" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. > 123 return -1; > 124 } > 125 > 126 rela->addend = insn_off - rela->sym->offset; > 127 } > 128 > > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first): This isn't a false positive, but I don't think we care. objtool is a run-once short lived thing. Also, in the above case, if we error we exit, absolutely no point in spending time on freeing memory.