Hi Rob, Stephen, On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 17:16 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > +Nicolas > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:19 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next build of Linus' tree (arm multi_v7_defconfig) produced > > these warnings: > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): > > /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address- cells > > (2) differs from /soc (1) > > > > I have no idea what caused this :-( > > A dtc update combined with changes that landed in the above file after > I tested and fixed the new warnings. Sorry for the warnings. A fix is already making its way into the soc fixes tree. Here's the commit for reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/26/445 Regards, Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
