Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10. 03. 20, 10:04, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:40:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   drivers/tty/vt/selection.c
>>
>> between commits:
>>
>>   4b70dd57a15d ("vt: selection, push console lock down")
>>   e8c75a30a23c ("vt: selection, push sel_lock up")
>>
>> from Linus' tree and commits:
>>
>>   9256d09f1da1 ("vt: selection, create struct from console selection globals")
>>   bc80932cc25a ("vt: selection, indent switch-case properly")
>>
>> from the tty tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
> 
> Thank you for this, I hadn't gotten to it yet.
> 
> Your merge looks the same as mine, and I've pushed out the merge
> resolution in my tree.
> 
> Jiri, can you double-check to verify that the merge is correct in my
> tree?
Yes, the result is exactly what I have in my tree.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux