On Wed 26-02-20 18:25:28, Cristopher Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Hmm, nasty. Is there any reason why kmalloc_node behaves differently > > from the page allocator? > > The page allocator will do the same thing if you pass GFP_THISNODE and > insist on allocating memory from a node that does not exist. I do not think that the page allocator would blow up even with GFP_THISNODE. The allocation would just fail on memory less node. Besides that kmalloc_node shouldn't really have an implicit GFP_THISNODE semantic right? At least I do not see anything like that documented anywhere. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
