> On Jan 14, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:22:21AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> >> Oh, I didn't realize I was the author. Sorry! >> >> Sure, confirmed >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > Hmm... the e-mail in question[1] was sent by Qian Cai, but there was a > > From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> > > in the first line of the body which attributed the patch to you. But > then e-mail continues: > > Sergey didn't like the locking order .... but those code is so old, > and I have no clue how to de-couple it after checking other locks in > the splat. There is an onging effort to make all printk() as deferred, > so until that happens, workaround it for now as a short-term fix. > > So did Qian Cai author the patch, and this should have been > "Reported-by Sergey Senozhatsky"? In which case I need a > Signed-off-by from Qian Cai. > > This is a pretty trivial patch, but it would be good to get the > attributions and credit correct! > > - Ted > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1573679785-21068-1-git-send-email-cai@xxxxxx/ It is actually Sergey proposed an informal patch here [1]. I just sent on his behave and adding a commit log. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190911011008.GA4420@jagdpanzerIV/
