On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 3:58 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 84bb46cd6228 ("Revert "bpf: Emit audit messages upon successful prog load and unload"")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> 8793e6b23b1e ("bpf: Move bpf_free_used_maps into sleepable section")
>
> from the bpf-next tree.
argh. I wonder whether individual reverts would have
helped git to avoid such conflict.
Anyhow I've rebased bpf-next on top of net-next to avoid this mess.
There was only one Fixes tag that I adjusted manually.
