On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:24:46AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > > between commit: > > e50be648aaa3 ("arm64: uaccess: Remove uaccess_*_not_uao asm macros") > > from the amr64-fixes tree and commit: > > 582f95835a8f ("arm64: entry: convert el0_sync to C") > > from the arm64 tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > index c764cc8fb3b6,a70575edae8e..000000000000 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > @@@ -57,13 -57,21 +57,4 @@@ alternative_else_nop_endi > .macro uaccess_ttbr0_enable, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3 > .endm > #endif > -- > --/* > - * Remove the address tag from a virtual address, if present. > - * These macros are no-ops when UAO is present. > -- */ > - .macro untagged_addr, dst, addr > - sbfx \dst, \addr, #0, #56 > - and \dst, \dst, \addr > - .macro uaccess_disable_not_uao, tmp1, tmp2 > - uaccess_ttbr0_disable \tmp1, \tmp2 > -alternative_if ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO > - SET_PSTATE_PAN(1) > -alternative_else_nop_endif > -- .endm > -- > - .macro uaccess_enable_not_uao, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3 > - uaccess_ttbr0_enable \tmp1, \tmp2, \tmp3 > -alternative_if ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO > - SET_PSTATE_PAN(0) > -alternative_else_nop_endif > - .endm Yup, that's fine. Delete both of the uaccess macros (good riddance!). Cheers, Will