Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (kcsan)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 19:34 +0100, 'Marco Elver' via kasan-dev wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > On 11/19/19 8:12 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 16:11, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 11/19/19 12:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Changes since 20191118:
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > on x86_64:
> > > > 
> > > > It seems that this function can already be known by the compiler as a
> > > > builtin:
> > > > 
> > > > ../kernel/kcsan/core.c:619:6: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘__tsan_func_exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
> > > >  void __tsan_func_exit(void)
> > > >       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > $ gcc --version
> > > > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190905 [gcc-7-branch revision 275407]
> > > 
> > > Interesting. Could you share the .config? So far I haven't been able
> > > to reproduce.
> > 
> > Sure, it's attached.
> 
> Thanks, the config did the trick, even for gcc 9.0.0.
> 
> The problem is CONFIG_UBSAN=y. We haven't explicitly disallowed it like
> with KASAN. In principle there should be nothing wrong with KCSAN+UBSAN.
> 
> There are 3 options:
> 1. Just disable UBSAN for KCSAN, and also disable KCSAN for UBSAN.
> 2. Restrict the config to not allow combining KCSAN and UBSAN.
> 3. Leave things as-is.
> 
> Option 1 probably makes most sense, and I'll send a patch for that
> unless there are major objections.

Both option #1 and #2 sounds quite unfortunate, as UBSAN is quite valuable for
debugging. Hence, it is desire to make both work at the same time.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux