Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:09:29 -0800
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191118125046.GB74767@gmail.com>
References: <20191118150858.1a436a12@canb.auug.org.au> <20191118090000.hpnibmk6xculuwii@linutronix.de> <20191118125046.GB74767@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:50:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So 5a6446626d7e is currently queued up for v5.5 as part of the RCU tree. 
> 
> I can cherry pick 5a6446626d7e into tip:core/urgent if Paul and Tejun 
> agree.

Yeah, please go ahead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
  - From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
  - From: Ingo Molnar

Prev by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
Next by Date: next/master boot: 181 boots: 8 failed, 141 passed with 32 offline (next-20191118)
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
Next by thread: linux-next: workqueues tree build failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]