Hi,
tl;dr: And IOMMU commit introduces a new user for sme_active() in
generic code, and commit
284e21fab2cf x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
breaks the build of drivers/iommu/ for all architectures not
implementing sme_active().
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:39:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c: In function 'iommu_subsys_init':
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c:123:38: error: implicit declaration of function 'sme_active'; did you mean 'cpu_active'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 123 | if (iommu_default_passthrough() && sme_active()) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> | cpu_active
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 2cc13bb4f59f ("iommu: Disable passthrough mode when SME is active")
Actually it is caused by:
commit 284e21fab2cfcf90dacce565e0b12f29e5df00c1
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Aug 6 01:49:17 2019 -0300
x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
which removes the sme_active prototype from the generic headers. The
iommu commit is in next already for a couple of days and didn't cause
problems before.
> sme_active() seems to be only relevant to X86.
It has an implementation on x86 and s390.
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Thanks, but I suggest reverting above commit instead.
Regards,
Joerg
