On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 05:43:41PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:54:08PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:38:01PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:30:24AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:24:32PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > > > allmodconfig) produced this warning: > > > > > > > > > > In file included from include/trace/events/erofs.h:8, > > > > > from <command-line>: > > > > > include/trace/events/erofs.h:28:37: warning: 'struct dentry' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration > > > > > TP_PROTO(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags), > > > > > ^~~~~~ > > > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:233:34: note: in definition of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE' > > > > > static inline void trace_##name(proto) \ > > > > > ^~~~~ > > > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:396:24: note: in expansion of macro 'PARAMS' > > > > > __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \ > > > > > ^~~~~~ > > > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:532:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE' > > > > > DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:532:22: note: in expansion of macro 'PARAMS' > > > > > DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > > > ^~~~~~ > > > > > include/trace/events/erofs.h:26:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT' > > > > > TRACE_EVENT(erofs_lookup, > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > include/trace/events/erofs.h:28:2: note: in expansion of macro 'TP_PROTO' > > > > > TP_PROTO(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags), > > > > > ^~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > and moany more like this ... > > > > Could you give me more log about this? I don't know how to reproduce that warning > > since I can compile x86-64 kernel image with my configproperly on my PC... > > I'm trying allmodconfig now... > > I have tested the latest staging-next tree with x86_64 allmodconfig with > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git > the following commands (on my x86-64 PC), > > $ make allmodconfig > $ make -j12 > > and it compiles successful as below: > LD [M] sound/usb/hiface/snd-usb-hiface.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/line6/snd-usb-line6.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/line6/snd-usb-pod.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/line6/snd-usb-podhd.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/line6/snd-usb-toneport.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/line6/snd-usb-variax.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/misc/snd-ua101.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/snd-usb-audio.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/snd-usbmidi-lib.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-us122l.ko > LD [M] sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-usx2y.ko > LD [M] sound/x86/snd-hdmi-lpe-audio.ko > LD [M] sound/xen/snd_xen_front.ko > LD [M] virt/lib/irqbypass.ko > g00380047@architecture4:~/oss/linux-staging$ > > I'm also testing the latest linux-next tree with commit 47e4937a4a7c applied, > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > > and the command is the same (on my x86-64 PC), > > $ make allmodconfig > $ make -j12 > > it seems all .o in fs/erofs have been generated properly, although the final > result hasn't been generated. I will reply the final result later... The attempt above compiles successfully as well... And I have tried the following commands (Just in case...) and the result turns out without any difference... $ make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig $ make ARCH=x86_64 -j16 and I'm so confused now... Hope to get your hints... Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Out of curiosity, are there some merge conflicts raised? Or could you give > me some hints (code and .config) to reproduce that? since I don't find any > potential issue in include/trace/events/erofs.h and fs/erofs/*... I have no > idea what happened and how to do next... Thank you very much! > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang > > > > > Thanks, > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > > Introduced by commit > > > > > > > > > > 47e4937a4a7c ("erofs: move erofs out of staging") > > > > > > > > > > (or, at least, exposed by it). It needs, at least, a "struct dentry;" > > > > > added to the file. > > > > > > > > Odd, why has this never been seen before when the same files were in > > > > drivers/staging/ and why 0-day isn't reporting this? > > > > > > I Think it is weird since it is never failed in staging and kbuild-all 0-day ci > > > (my tree and you tree).... > > > > > > > > > > > Gao, can you send me a patch for this? > > > > > > Got it, I will look into that... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > >
