Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 21:35:58 +0200
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>, ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxx>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190814002836.4b6aa14b@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20190814002836.4b6aa14b@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also, please
> keep them with the rest of the other tags.

Thanks for the report. How bad is this? Should I undo the merge and
wait for an updated pull request?

      Arnd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

References:
- linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: CPUfreq fail on rk3399-firefly (was: next/master boot: 285 boots: 16 failed, 264 passed with 3 offline, 1 untried/unknown, 1 conflict (next-20190718))
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
Previous by thread: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux