Hi Will, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:24:23 +0100 Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Paul, Palmer -- If it's not too late, then it would probably be best to > stick this commit (60c1b220d8bc) and any dependencies on their own stable > branch so that we can both pull it into our respective trees and I can > resolve this conflict in the arm64 tree, which I'll send early during the > merge window. > > Looking at your tree, I guess I could just pull in > common/for-v5.4-rc1/cpu-topology if you promise never to rebase it. Failing > that, you could fork a new branch from 60c1b220d8bc and I could just pull > that part instead. It may not be worth it, the conflict is not that bad. Unless you forsee more conflicts arising. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpJt5GeteOgd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
