Hi all, After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: mm/madvise.c: In function 'madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range': mm/madvise.c:346:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_huge_zero_pmd'; did you mean 'is_huge_zero_pud'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (is_huge_zero_pmd(orig_pmd)) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ is_huge_zero_pud mm/madvise.c:373:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_young'; did you mean 'pte_young'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (pmd_young(orig_pmd)) { ^~~~~~~~~ pte_young mm/madvise.c:375:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_mkold'; did you mean 'pte_mkold'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd); ^~~~~~~~~ pte_mkold mm/madvise.c:377:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_pmd_at'; did you mean 'set_pte_at'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, orig_pmd); ^~~~~~~~~~ set_pte_at Caused by commit d6d92199f211 ("mm, madvise: introduce MADV_COLD") I have reverted (I assume the first four depend on the last): 674db9810e45 ("mm, madvise: factor out common parts between MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT") 5bd341efe8f1 ("mm, madvise: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT") c487c618dcf1 ("mm, madvise: account nr_isolated_xxx in [isolate|putback]_lru_page") 1ef762b1c799 ("mm, madvise: change PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN with PAGE_REFRECLAIM") d6d92199f211 ("mm, madvise: introduce MADV_COLD") for today (as - I just noticed - is suggested in another email). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp4eTZwvjVd9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature