Em Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:26:40 +0000
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:46:14AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/index.rst
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 09fdc957ad0d ("docs: leds: add it to the driver-api book")
> > (and others following)
> >
> > from the v4l-dvb-next tree and commit:
> >
> > a3a400da206b ("docs: infiniband: add it to the driver-api bookset")
> >
> > from the rdma tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> I'm surprised this is coming from a v4l tree..
Jon asked me to send a pull request with the pending conversion
patches. I opted to apply them to my v4l-dvb-next tree, just because
it was the simplest way of having those at linux-next :-)
>
> > diff --cc Documentation/index.rst
> > index f379e43fcda0,869616b57aa8..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
> > @@@ -96,23 -90,9 +96,24 @@@ needed)
> >
> > driver-api/index
> > core-api/index
> > + locking/index
> > + accounting/index
> > + block/index
> > + cdrom/index
> > + ide/index
> > + fb/index
> > + fpga/index
> > + hid/index
> > + iio/index
> > + leds/index
> > + infiniband/index
>
> This should be kept sorted, Mauro rdma is already merged you'll need
> to tell Linus about this trivial conflict when you send your patches.
Yeah, I placed a comment about that at the pull request I sent
earlier today.
In any case, this is a simple conflict. It should be trivial for
Linus to address it.
Thanks,
Mauro
