-----"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ----- >To: "Bernard Metzler" <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Date: 07/11/2019 01:53PM >Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen Rothwell" ><sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Doug Ledford" <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David >Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Networking" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, >"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux Kernel >Mailing List" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of >the net-next tree > >On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > >> That listen will not sleep. The socket is just marked >> listening. > >Eh? siw_listen_address() calls siw_cep_alloc() which does: > > struct siw_cep *cep = kzalloc(sizeof(*cep), GFP_KERNEL); > >Which is sleeping. Many other cases too. > >Jason > > Ah, true! I was after really deep sleeps like user level socket accept() calls ;) So you are correct of course. Thanks! Bernard
