Hi all,
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:16:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:33:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 5f41f9198f29 ("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores")
> >
> > from the arm tree and commit:
> >
> > 9f532d26c75c ("ARM: exynos_defconfig: Trim and reorganize with savedefconfig")
> >
> > from the samsung-krzk tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > index 9b959afaaa12,f140532ddca7..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > @@@ -4,12 -5,7 +5,8 @@@ CONFIG_PREEMPT=
> > CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
> > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
> > - CONFIG_MODULES=y
> > - CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
> > - CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
> > CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y
> > - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS3=y
> > +CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND=y
> > CONFIG_SMP=y
> > CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE=y
> > CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8
>
> This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the arm tree.
I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpwNrwMiJ7ty.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
