Hi all,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:42:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.txt
>
> between commit:
>
> 10ffebbed550 ("docs: fault-injection: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst")
>
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
>
> 7e31d8215fd8 ("Documentation: nvme: add an example for nvme fault injection")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file and applied the following patch) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:39:46 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: nvme: fix for change to rst
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.rst | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.rst b/Documentation/fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.rst
> index bbb1bf3e8650..cdb2e829228e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/fault-injection/nvme-fault-injection.rst
> @@ -118,3 +118,61 @@ Message from dmesg::
> cpu_startup_entry+0x6f/0x80
> start_secondary+0x187/0x1e0
> secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
> +
> +Example 3: Inject an error into the 10th admin command
> +------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +::
> +
> + echo 100 > /sys/kernel/debug/nvme0/fault_inject/probability
> + echo 10 > /sys/kernel/debug/nvme0/fault_inject/space
> + echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/nvme0/fault_inject/times
> + nvme reset /dev/nvme0
> +
> +Expected Result::
> +
> + After NVMe controller reset, the reinitialization may or may not succeed.
> + It depends on which admin command is actually forced to fail.
> +
> +Message from dmesg::
> +
> + nvme nvme0: resetting controller
> + FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
> + name fault_inject, interval 1, probability 100, space 1, times 1
> + CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc2+ #2
> + Hardware name: MSI MS-7A45/B150M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A45), BIOS 1.50 04/25/2017
> + Call Trace:
> + <IRQ>
> + dump_stack+0x63/0x85
> + should_fail+0x14a/0x170
> + nvme_should_fail+0x38/0x80 [nvme_core]
> + nvme_irq+0x129/0x280 [nvme]
> + ? blk_mq_end_request+0xb3/0x120
> + __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x84/0x1a0
> + handle_irq_event_percpu+0x32/0x80
> + handle_irq_event+0x3b/0x60
> + handle_edge_irq+0x7f/0x1a0
> + handle_irq+0x20/0x30
> + do_IRQ+0x4e/0xe0
> + common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
> + </IRQ>
> + RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xc5/0x460
> + Code: ff e8 8f 5f 86 ff 80 7d c7 00 74 17 9c 58 0f 1f 44 00 00 f6 c4 02 0f 85 69 03 00 00 31 ff e8 62 aa 8c ff fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <45> 85 ed 0f 88 37 03 00 00 4c 8b 45 d0 4c 2b 45 b8 48 ba cf f7 53
> + RSP: 0018:ffffffff88c03dd0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffdc
> + RAX: ffff9dac25a2ac80 RBX: ffffffff88d53760 RCX: 000000000000001f
> + RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000002d958403 RDI: 0000000000000000
> + RBP: ffffffff88c03e18 R08: fffffff75e35ffb7 R09: 00000a49a56c0b48
> + R10: ffffffff88c03da0 R11: 0000000000001b0c R12: ffff9dac25a34d00
> + R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 0000000000000006 R15: ffffffff88d53760
> + cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x40
> + call_cpuidle+0x23/0x40
> + do_idle+0x201/0x280
> + cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20
> + rest_init+0xaa/0xb0
> + arch_call_rest_init+0xe/0x1b
> + start_kernel+0x51c/0x53b
> + x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x26
> + x86_64_start_kernel+0x74/0x77
> + secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
> + nvme nvme0: Could not set queue count (16385)
> + nvme nvme0: IO queues not created
> --
> 2.20.1
I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpUSG4LUGu8t.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
