On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:28:37PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:47:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > e39afe3d6dbd ("RDMA: Convert CQ allocations to be under core responsibility")
> >
> > from the rdma tree and commit:
> >
> > 38164b771947 ("net/mlx5: mlx5_core_create_cq() enhancements")
> >
> > from the mlx5-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
>
> This is now a conflict between the net-next tree and the rdma tree.
You'll see the mlx5-next merge with rdma tomorrow that will take care
of this
Thanks,
Jason
