Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (task_struct: cached_requested_key)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> 
> Changes since 20190625:
> 
> 
> The keys tree gained conflicts aginst the ecryptfs and integrity trees.

Multiple build errors like this when CONFIG_KEYS is not set/enabled:
(this was seen on one i386 build)


# CONFIG_KEYS is not set
CONFIG_KEYS_REQUEST_CACHE=y


  CC      arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul_glue.o
In file included from ../include/linux/export.h:45:0,
                 from ../include/linux/linkage.h:7,
                 from ../include/linux/kernel.h:8,
                 from ../arch/x86/entry/common.c:10:
../include/linux/tracehook.h: In function ‘tracehook_notify_resume’:
../include/linux/tracehook.h:191:22: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘cached_requested_key’
  if (unlikely(current->cached_requested_key)) {
                      ^



-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux