> On 19 Jun 2019, at 15:13, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I've fixed this as follows, thanks:
>
> ====================
> From 23cdf8752b26d4edbd60a6293bca492d83192d4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:12:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] act_ctinfo: Don't use BIT() in UAPI headers.
>
> Use _BITUL() instead.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> index da803e05a89b..32337304fbe5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ enum {
> #define TCA_CTINFO_MAX (__TCA_CTINFO_MAX - 1)
>
> enum {
> - CTINFO_MODE_DSCP = BIT(0),
> - CTINFO_MODE_CPMARK = BIT(1)
> + CTINFO_MODE_DSCP = _BITUL(0),
> + CTINFO_MODE_CPMARK = _BITUL(1)
> };
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Hi David,
Thanks for that. Owe you a beer!
Thinking out loud, doesn’t this also require:
#include <linux/const.h>
Or at least iproute2 would need to know about _BITUL as it doesn’t at present.
Which also means iproute2’s Linux uapi shadow would also have to import
linux/const.h. Or have I got wrong end of stick?
Cheers,
Kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
