Hi all, On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:32:29 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:04:39 +0200 > Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > OK, so that means I should send my pull request after yours in the next > > > > merge window? To avoid the build breakage? > > > > > > Either that or you can apply my patch on your tree before the > > > patch that caused the breakage. > > > > > > Just let me know what works best for you. > > > > Hmm, the offending patch is already in -next and I don't rebase my tree. > > So, I guess it's the merge window dependency then. > > > Ok, I'll merge it through my tree then. It should go into the i2c tree (since that is where the *warning* was introduced). It is only a warning and there won't be many patches between the patch that introduced the warning and this one that fixes it. This patch could then have a Fixes tag that makes sense i.e. it will reference a previous commit. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpJSyvce4RpA.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
