On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:16:47AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote: > Hi, Stephen/Shawn > I realized this issue last week when I updated my Linux-next tree (NOT sure why I did NOT meet such issue when I did the patch), so I resent the patch series of adding head file "io.h" to fix this issue, please apply below V2 patch series instead, sorry for the inconvenience. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944681/ Okay, fixed. Sorry for the breakage, Stephen. Shawn > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 6:38 AM > > To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing > > List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx>; > > Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the imx-mxs tree > > > > Hi Shawn, > > > > After merging the imx-mxs tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/clk/imx/clk.c: In function 'imx_mmdc_mask_handshake': > > drivers/clk/imx/clk.c:20:8: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'readl_relaxed'; did you mean 'xchg_relaxed'? [-Werror=implicit-function- > > declaration] > > reg = readl_relaxed(ccm_base + CCM_CCDR); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > xchg_relaxed > > drivers/clk/imx/clk.c:22:2: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'writel_relaxed'; did you mean 'xchg_relaxed'? [-Werror=implicit-function- > > declaration] > > writel_relaxed(reg, ccm_base + CCM_CCDR); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > xchg_relaxed > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 0dc6b492b6e0 ("clk: imx: Add common API for masking MMDC handshake") > > > > I have used the imx-mxs tree from next-20190520 for today. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Stephen Rothwell
