On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:04:42AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 08:58:36AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Even though it's not going into 5.1 I feel it's helpful to keep it in > > the vhost tree until the next cycle, it helps make sure unrelated > > changes don't break it. > > It is not going to 5.1, so it shouldn't be in linux-next, no? And when > it is going upstream, it should do so through the iommu tree. If you > keep it separatly in the vhost tree for testing purposes, please make > sure it is not included into your linux-next branch. > > Regards, > > Joerg Joerg, what are we doing with these patches? It was tested in next with no bad effects. I sent an ack - do you want to pick it up? Or have me include it in my pull? Thanks! -- MST
