Hi Leon,
Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
between commit:
35b0aa67b298 ("RDMA/mlx5: Refactor netdev affinity code")
from the rdma tree and commit:
c42260f19545 ("net/mlx5: Separate and generalize dma device from pci device")
from the mlx5-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index 6135a0b285de,fae6a6a1fbea..000000000000
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@@ -200,12 -172,18 +200,12 @@@ static int mlx5_netdev_event(struct not
switch (event) {
case NETDEV_REGISTER:
+ /* Should already be registered during the load */
+ if (ibdev->is_rep)
+ break;
write_lock(&roce->netdev_lock);
- if (ndev->dev.parent == &mdev->pdev->dev)
- if (ibdev->rep) {
- struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = ibdev->mdev->priv.eswitch;
- struct net_device *rep_ndev;
-
- rep_ndev = mlx5_ib_get_rep_netdev(esw,
- ibdev->rep->vport);
- if (rep_ndev == ndev)
- roce->netdev = ndev;
- } else if (ndev->dev.parent == mdev->device) {
++ if (ndev->dev.parent == mdev->device)
roce->netdev = ndev;
- }
write_unlock(&roce->netdev_lock);
break;
Attachment:
pgpxV1ADcMyqT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
