On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:54:02AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 18:29:58 -0500 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:24 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > d63716658ac1 ("drm/amd/display: Use vrr friendly pageflip throttling in DC.")
> > >
> > > from the drm-fixes tree and commits:
> > >
> > > 8a48b44cd00f ("drm/amd/display: Call into DC once per multiplane flip")
> > > bc7f670ee04c ("drm/amd/display: Perform plane updates only when needed")
> > >
> > > from the drm tree.
> > >
> > > I had no idea how to resolve this, so I just effectively reverted the
> > > drm-fixes commit.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> >
> > d63716658ac1 ("drm/amd/display: Use vrr friendly pageflip throttling
> > in DC.") should be reverted and this should be applied instead for
> > drm-next:
> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/commit/?h=drm-next-5.2-wip&id=5d5f43c235d02e4d8e9d50d012f3b21f380486eb
>
> Maybe you should merge the drm-fixes tree into the drm tree and apply
> the above ...
Alex, can you pls get the amdgpu trees added to linux-next? From a quick
look those still seem to be missing.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
