Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:25:22PM CET, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:58:11 +0100
>
>> Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:02:01PM CET, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:36:11 +0100
>>>
>>>> Would be good to have some robot checking "Fixes" sanity...
>>>
>>>I want to add a script to my trees that locally do it for me but the
>> 
>> When it is in tree, it's already late. The robot has to check
>> emails/patchwork.
>
>It's for me, on my computer, to abort things when I try to commit
>with a bad fixes tag or missing signoff.

Okay, but still, robot checking emails/patchwork would safe you some
overhead.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux