Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:37 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   f6be4d16039b ("selftests/bpf: make sure signal interrupts BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN")

Ouch. Thanks for the heads up.

Daniel,
should we drop this one from bpf tree ?
I don't think it's strictly necessary.

> from the bpf tree and commits:
>
>   bf0f0fd93945 ("selftests/bpf: add simple BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN examples for flow dissector")
>   ab963beb9f5d ("selftests/bpf: add bpf_spin_lock C test")
>   ba72a7b4badb ("selftests/bpf: test for BPF_F_LOCK")
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux