On 2/12/19 3:49 PM, Nick Crews wrote: > OK, here is the patch to fix this problem. We had the dependency backwards. > > Should I re-send out the entire patch series to the LKML with this fix in it? > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > index 462eb9dfa4f2..b69561050868 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config CROS_EC_LPC > > config CROS_EC_LPC_MEC > bool "ChromeOS Embedded Controller LPC Microchip EC (MEC) variant" > - depends on CROS_EC_LPC || WILCO_EC > + depends on CROS_EC_LPC > default n > help > If you say Y here, a variant LPC protocol for the Microchip EC > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig > index d8e2cddb4712..6ea2d3f64ce5 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > config WILCO_EC > tristate "ChromeOS Wilco Embedded Controller" > - depends on ACPI && X86 > + depends on ACPI && X86 && CROS_EC_LPC_MEC > select CROS_EC_LPC_MEC > help > If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS > > Hi Nick, Your emails contain html and are not being archived by lore.kernel.org or by marc.info. Please fix that (no html) and resend the patch. I don't know the answer to your question. I would expect that whoever merged the current drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/ source files could/would just take the new Kconfig patch and merge it also. -- ~Randy