From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:44:27 +1100
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
> net/core/sock.c:914:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/core/sock.c:915:2: note: here
> case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
> ^~~~
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 9718475e6908 ("socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW")
Thanks, I just pushed the following:
====================
[PATCH] net: Fix fall through warning in y2038 tstamp changes.
net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
net/core/sock.c:914:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/sock.c:915:2: note: here
case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
^~~~
Fixes: 9718475e6908 ("socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/sock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index a8904ae40713..71ded4d8025c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -912,6 +912,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
case SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW:
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+ /* fall through */
case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
if (val & ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK) {
ret = -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
