Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:34:01AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/17/19 11:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>> Could you share me the .config?
> >>
> > Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work.
> > 
> >> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please
> >> feel free to try the following patch:
> >>
> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2
> >>
> > Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine.
> 
> The patches were pulled, I think Ming would still appreciate it if
> you could test the previous tree with that patch on top.
> 

next-20190116 with Ming's patch added and "sh: generate uapi header and
syscall table header files" reverted:

Qemu test results:
	total: 343 pass: 343 fail: 0

Note though that my tests do not run any block device stress tests.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux