On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:33:30AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:29:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the cisco tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > dcf8001d292b ("vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
> >
> > from the vfs tree and commit:
> >
> > 2c070709ea75 ("This updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
> >
> > from the cisco tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> > index e493202bf265,ee109f490b22..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> > @@@ -51,7 -51,7 +51,8 @@@
> > #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
> > #include <xen/xen.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
> > + #include <linux/cmdline.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> This is now a conflict between the cicso tree and Linus' tree.
I did a rebase after your original made this. I'm not sure it's needed any
longer. However, I was planning to rebase my tree again on top of the latest
Linus tree. How would you like to proceed ?
Daniel
