linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the fscrypt tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/fs.h

between commit:

  a2bd7d2fc32c ("fs-verity: add setup code, UAPI, and Kconfig")

from the fscrypt tree and commit:

  013c7af575e5 ("vfs: Implement a filesystem superblock creation/configuration context")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/fs.h
index b2f9913eee10,169ca472d16a..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@@ -62,8 -61,8 +62,10 @@@ struct workqueue_struct
  struct iov_iter;
  struct fscrypt_info;
  struct fscrypt_operations;
 +struct fsverity_info;
 +struct fsverity_operations;
+ struct fs_context;
+ struct fs_parameter_description;
  
  extern void __init inode_init(void);
  extern void __init inode_init_early(void);

Attachment: pgpkwLD0HTvao.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux