Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 10:55pm -0500,
Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/9/18 8:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It appears that there are a series of shared patches between the block
> > and device-mapper trees that are not the same commits.  I assume that the
> > block tree has been rebased, while the device mapper tree that was based
> > (or includes) part of the block tree has not bee rebased (yet).
> 
> Yep that's my fault, due to a stupid mistake I had to rebase the
> block tree. Didn't realize that Mike's tree was based on it. Mike,
> would it be a big issue for you to rebase the dm tree?

No problem, just did it and pushed to linux-dm.git's for-next.
(I was already anticipating rebasing dm's for-next again once the
bio-based percpu in_flight was merged into linux-block, hopefully we can
get that to land)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux