On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:16:01AM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 12:01:46PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 05:53:13AM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 08:58:07AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > your patch 77cab92a2cb1 ("sysctl: clean up nr_pdflush_threads
> > > > leftover") in linux-next breaks strace compilation if used with kernel
> > > > headers from linux-next.
> > > > - VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS=15, /* nr_pdflush_threads */
> > > > + VM_UNUSED15=15, /* was: int: nr_pdflush_threads */
> > > The nr_pdflush_threads (VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS) tunable has been obsolete since 2.6.32
> > > and it was, excepting by the bit in the referred patch, completely removed on 4.15.
> > >
> > > I think you just need to patch strace source with the following hunk, in
> > > order to reflect the removal. Would you mind checking it?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/xlat/sysctl_vm.in b/xlat/sysctl_vm.in
> > > index 3c2b4739..30784c2a 100644
> > > --- a/xlat/sysctl_vm.in
> > > +++ b/xlat/sysctl_vm.in
> > > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ VM_DIRTY_BACKGROUND
> > > VM_DIRTY_RATIO
> > > VM_DIRTY_WB_CS
> > > VM_DIRTY_EXPIRE_CS
> > > -VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS
> > > VM_OVERCOMMIT_RATIO
> > > VM_PAGEBUF
> > > VM_HUGETLB_PAGES
> >
> > I'll leave that up to Dmitry to decide what to do here. At least it
> > won't be possible to compile old strace versions with new kernel
> > headers if the kernel change gets merged upstream.
> >
>
> It escapes me why strace bootstrap needs to tabulate these sysctl_vm, as no one
> of these defs are referenced in the rest of the code, let alone
> /proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads that means nothing since per-BDI flusher threads
> were introduced almost 10 years ago.
This isn't ok, we shouldn't break userspace, I'll go revert this patch.
Rafael, feel free to resend but just add a comment that says it is
obsolete or something.
thanks,
greg k-h
