Hi Kees, On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:48:10 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:31:40 -0600 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Both of those cases are intentional fallthroughs and there are > > > existing comments in the code noting the reasons for them to > > > fallthrough > > > > > > (also can see the reasoning for these in the commits which introduced > > > them from Sachin c369c9a4a7c82) and dde2356c84662) > > > > I am not questioning that :-) > > > > The gcc warning can be turned off by adding a /* fall through */ > > comment at the point the fall through happens. Kees and others are > > working on the several hundred other places that need annotating. > > Right. The goal is to avoid adding any _new_ cases of this. :) > > > This one just popped up. > > It's already working! :) Thanks Stephen! Actually this one was the product of how I filter out warnings ... it was an old one, but the line numbers changed. I have now started ignoring these if just the line numbers change. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpf86z63xueR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
