Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:11:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 164477c2331b ("x86/mm: Clarify hardware vs. software "error_code"")
> (and others from that series)
>
> from the tip tree and commits:
>
> 768fd9c69bb5 ("signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from bad_area_nosemaphore")
> 25c102d803ea ("signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from mm_fault_error")
>
> from the userns tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index c2e3e5127ebc,8d77700a7883..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +/* Handle faults in the user portion of the address space */
> +static inline
> +void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> + unsigned long hw_error_code,
> + unsigned long address)
> +{
> + unsigned long sw_error_code;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + vm_fault_t fault, major = 0;
> + unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
> + u32 pkey;
I missed removing the above line.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpPihQsvPNCp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
