* Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 184d47f0fd36 ("x86/mm: Avoid VLA in pgd_alloc()")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 1be3f247c288 ("x86/mm: Avoid VLA in pgd_alloc()")
> >
> > from the tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I used the version from Linus' tree) and can carry the
> > fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> > but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> > maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
> > to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> > minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
This is the correct resolution, thanks Stephen!
> Ingo, it looks like that commit needs to be split up again ... Linus's
> tree still needs the fix for the fix?
-next still had the old commit, I've now refreshed tip:auto-latest so the
conflict should go away in the next iteration.
Linus's tree has the correct fix.
Thanks,
Ingo
