On 11/10/2018 04:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:22:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 233a7cb23531 ("kvm: arm64: Allow tuning the physical address size for VM")
>>
>> from the kvm-arm tree and commit:
>>
>> aa069a996951 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add a VM capability to enable nested virtualization")
>>
>> from the kvm-ppc tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index 95aa73ca65dc,7f2ff3a76995..000000000000
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@@ -962,7 -954,7 +963,8 @@@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt
>> #define KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE 157
>> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 158
>> #define KVM_CAP_MSR_PLATFORM_INFO 159
>> -#define KVM_CAP_PPC_NESTED_HV 160
>> +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE 160 /* returns maximum IPA bits for a VM */
>> ++#define KVM_CAP_PPC_NESTED_HV 161
>>
>> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>
>
> This is now a conflict between the kvm tree and the kvm-arm tree.
Indeed, and ARM will be bumped to 161 (whoever comes first to the kvm
tree wins).
Paolo
