Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as >> Mike's removing bootmem. > > In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal > conflicts with new added uses. :-) I suppose. Though the last time we added a new include of bootmem.h was 2015, and that should have actually been memblock.h. >> I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is >> actually defined anyway. > > However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until > after it is removed. OK. I guess I'll leave it for Andrew to squash in to the series. cheers
