Hello Stephen, Mark & All,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:25:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:16:44 +0300 Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 01:07:48PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the regulator tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c: In function 'bd718xx_i2c_probe':
> > > drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c:101:23: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> > > bd718xx->chip_type = (unsigned int)
> >
> > I am pretty sure the last patch version corrected this to
> > + bd71837->chip_type = (unsigned int)(uintptr_t)
> > + of_device_get_match_data(&i2c->dev);
> >
> > is it possible one of the earlier versions has accidentally been
> > applied? Should I create patch on top of the last regulator tree or what
> > is the simplest way fix this?
>
> Sorry, this came from commit
>
> dd2be639f4a9 ("regulator/mfd: bd718xx: rename bd71837/bd71847 common instances")
>
> which is later than the commit I noted. In this later commit, this happens:
>
> - bd71837->chip_irq = i2c->irq;
> - bd71837->chip_type = (unsigned int)(uintptr_t)
> + bd718xx->chip_irq = i2c->irq;
> + bd718xx->chip_type = (unsigned int)
> of_device_get_match_data(&i2c->dev);
Right. So looks like I am still the guilty one then. I've overwritten
the fix in this rename patch which followed the corrected initial
support patch. I guess sending incremental patch with fix to regulator
tree is correct way to go, right? I'll prepare one against Mark's branch
"origin/topic/bd718xx". Mark, please let me know if you want me to send
it or if I should do it on top of some other branch.
Br,
Matti Vaittinen
