Hi David, On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:01:00 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think the problem is that I haven't allocated system call numbers for > > > any arches other than x86 - even the x86 syscall numbers are provisional > > > until the patchset is taken upstream. I'm not sure of the best way to > > > deal with this - make the samples dependent on the X86 arch? > > > > But the sample programs are built with HOSTCC, so you can't depend on > > ARCH (since I, for one, am cross compiling). Maybe SUBARCH. Better > > would be to use either Kconfig's shell primitive or some make magic to > > figure out if the syscall number define's are defined. > > I meant put the dependency in the Kconfig. Yeah, sure. Kconfig now has the ability for that dependency to be the result of an external program "$(shell ....)", so you could have a script or program that checked to see if the syscall numbers are defined and then have the Kconfig symbol(s) for the tests depend on that. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpTwoTqgwqxC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
